Hugo Grenier vs Mattias Siimar Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W W L L
Form
W W L W W W W L W LHead-2-Head: Grenier 1 - 0 Siimar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Grenier winning 2 and Siimar winning 0. The last match between Grenier and Siimar was at the Italy F13 (Padova), 06-06-2018, Second, Clay with Hugo Grenier getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hugo Grenier | 1 |
| Mattias Siimar | 0 |
| Grenier | Stats | Siimar |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 184 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 95 | Highest Rank | |
| 29 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (420-314) | Career Total W/L | 55% (35-29) |
| $733,015 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Hugo Grenier
Player
Mattias Siimar
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:37:0 | Average Match Time | 1:37:0 |
| 55% (29/53) | 1st Serve % | 58% (39/67) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (19/39) |
| 38% (9/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 51% (34/67) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hugo Grenier vs Mattias Siimar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Grenier 1 - 0 Siimar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grenier has won 47.19% of points on their second serve, while Siimar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grenier, in recent form, has won 46.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Siimar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.83% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grenier has saved 52.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siimar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grenier has won 52.78% of matches played (W/L 38/ 34), with Siimar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grenier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 232/ 123), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 54/ 74). Siimar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 24/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Grenier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52% of matches (W/L 26/ 24), where as Siimar has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Grenier winning 1 times and Siimar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Grenier winning 2 and Siimar winning 0. The last match between Grenier and Siimar was at the Italy F13 (Padova), 06-06-2018, Second, Clay with Hugo Grenier getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grenier and Siimar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grenier winning 0 times and Siimar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grenier winning 0, and Siimar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grenier has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.13 while Siimar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grenier has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siimar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grenier has converted 28.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siimar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Hugo Grenier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
15
Aces
18
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
47 of
56)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
33 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
21 of
89)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Bernard Tomic
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
8
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Christopher Eubanks
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
75%
(
24 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Hugo Grenier
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
18 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Jie Cui
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Hugo Grenier
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
16
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mattias Siimar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Mattias Siimar
48%
(
42 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Kenneth Raisma
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Benjamin Lock
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Vilius Gaubas
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Sabanin
Player
Mattias Siimar
15%
(
2 of
13)
1st Serve %
75%
(
6 of
8)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
8 of
8)
20
Total Points Won
1
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Simon Freund
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mattias Siimar
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Grenier vs Siimar?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Grenier Vs Siimar is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (420/314) | Win/Loss | 55% (35/29) |
| 56% (959/760) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (77/70) |
| 52% (8558/7855) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (702/660) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 3769 | Aces Total | 87 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1999 | Total Double Faults | 135 |
| 1:30:15 | Average Match Time | 1:2:55 |
| 465.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.02 |
| 64% (28450/44600) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1719/2843) |
| 71% (20218/28450) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1167/1719) |
| 48% (7687/16149) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (548/1124) |
| 41% (1822/4447) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (130/290) |
| 39% (18018/45832) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1174/2870) |
| 58% (408/705) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (35/63) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (125/240) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 18% (2/11) |
| 53% (125/238) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (13/20) |
| 84% (412/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (34/30) |
| 16% (412/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (34/4) |
| 23% (322/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (30/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
